Sunday, February 22, 2009
More of Nancy's Pictures from Last Summer
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Some Pictures from Last Summer
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Travel Observations
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5aa64/5aa64d6448cec8c3ca84b0f1f3ab988fa26d5784" alt=""
Monsieur de Tocqueville was both impressed with Quebec and rather bleak about it's future. It seems he was rather surprised to find a region of French speakers in Montreal and Quebec. In a letter to a friend back in France he said;"They are as French as you and I. Indeed, they are more like us than the Americans of the United States are like the English. I cannot tell you how pleasant it was to find ourselves among these people. We felt at home, and everywhere people received us as compatriots. " (Letter to Abbé Lesueur,September 7, 1831) De Tocqueville was impressed with the faithful reproduction of French customs, language, landscape and even the architecture. He found in Montreal and the villages he traveled though a striking similarity with the French countryside, and with the French countryside of the 18th century. That didn't necessarily remain the case. If you travel through Quebec, as we did at the beginning and end of our travels to France in 2007, I think it resembles North America more than it does France. You can see echos of France in old Montreal and in some of the architecture of rural Quebec, but however beautiful, you never feel as if you've been transported to France.
De Tocqueville was not so overjoyed at the perceived future of the French language in North America. "In Canada I have just seen a million fine, intelligent Frenchmen, who should have formed the nucleus of a great French nation in America but have somehow ended up living as strangers in their own land.... The die is now cast: all of North America will speak English. " (Letter to his brother Edouard, November 26, 1831) Well, he was partially right. Virtually all of North America does speak English (if you wrongly exclude Mexico as part of Central America). However, as we know, the province of Quebec speaks French and they are very adamant about that remaining the case. And in my limited experience travelling through Quebec, virtually all of them speak English as a second language.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Leave Only Tracks, Take Only Pictures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57d27/57d274b4f2d7e76b8f34e7ff504e485a8ca3119c" alt=""
When I worked for Resource Management in Yellowstone part of our responsibilities were to protect the natural resources. Besides the trees, geysers and animals, one overlooked portion of the natural resource were artifacts like arrowheads, rock specimens, animal bones, antlers and yes, bison skulls. These items tend to disappear with remarkable regularity. I’ve heard that Petrified National Park near Holbrook, Arizona no longer has any small to medium size petrified wood. Even some large specimens have managed to get in a truck and leave. Saguaro National Park has had some of their saguaros disappear. Indian artifacts walk off from Mesa Verde and other protected lands in the west.
It is illegal to remove any natural object from the National Parks but it is very difficult to enforce. When we lived in Montana we would regularly hear of "horn hunters" getting caught in Yellowstone with elk antlers in their possession. Their goal was to take the antlers to the antler sale in Jackson, Wyoming and offer them up for auction. Buyers wold come from all over the planet to purchase the antlers. Some would use them as decoration for their brand new rustic western castles, and some would buy them for the Asian market. Some Asian gentlemen believe that ground up elk antler (and bear gall bladders, but that’s another story) added to their tea would add to their potency. Viagra, to some extent has put an end to this market.
So, how would we try to protect the bison skull and elk antlers in Yellowstone? When we would see someone throwing an elk antler in the car, we would take note of their licence plate and call law enforcement. If we would find elk antlers in the backcountry we would try to make it less conspicuous by depositing it far from the trail, or throwing into some inaccessible place. High technology has entered the fray. Antlers and skulls have been fitted with GPS locators and rangers know when they begin moving around.
Why is it illegal to remove objects? It’s apparent why you shouldn’t remove rocks, trees and petrified wood. That’s why people come to the parks: to see those things. Why are antlers, skulls and bones illegal to remove?. They are part of the natural ecosystem and add to the visitor’s experience. But more importantly, they are a food source to those on the bottom of the food chain. Rodents gnaw on antlers for a source of calcium and other nutrients. Their remains enrich the soil. So in an effort to keep skulls, especially bison skulls in the park, we had to destroy them.
We’d find a bison skull near a trail and we’d smash it on a rock or bust it up with a pulaski. If we left it intact, it would disappear and be out of the park by the next day. People are absolutely shocked to learn we smashed bison skulls and many times I’ve explained our rationale. Skulls don’t add much to the visitor’s experience if they are on someone’s wall, and they don’t do much when busted up into many pieces. But at least they don’t walk off. They return to the soil, to the "resource".
By the way, on my way into the doctor’s examining room, I examined the bison skull. It was a resin or plastic reproduction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)